Delete Wired_VS_Wireless.md

This commit is contained in:
Prohurtz 2022-08-12 14:37:58 -07:00 committed by GitHub
parent 46392eee0f
commit d0c983ca33
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23

View File

@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
---
layout: page
title: Differences Between Wired and Wireless setups
permalink: /Wired-VS-Wireless-Setups/
nav_order: 2
parent: Getting Started
---
## This page will compare the differences between a wireless setup verses a wired one.
{% include custom/alerts/Note.html content="Things may change so this is only true with the current hardware as of 6/20/22." %}
## Wired:
### Pros:
- Plug and play, no firmware or wifi router needed
- Lowest latency
{% include custom/alerts/Note.html content="Our latency with wireless setups is pretty low, (20-35ms) you will not be able to see a difference in social VR applications. This would only become a noticable change if we ever get DFR working." %}
- Higher resolution
{% include custom/alerts/Note.html content="Higher resolution does not result in a measurable tracking quality change although it can help." %}
### Cons:
- More expensive at around twice the cost of wireless
- Requires 2 usb ports and usb bandwith, wireless uses 1 port for only power.
- Camera disassembly is required to remove the IR filter
- USB bus issues
{% include custom/alerts/Warning.html content="Due to USB issues, only 1 camera per headset is supported unless you have 2 seperate USB ports to plug in to. USB hubs WILL NOT WORK." %}
## Wireless
### Pros:
- Cheapest
- Wireless
- Only requires 1 usb for power
- Cameras do not need to be disassembled (for 160 fov)
### Cons:
- Requires a WiFi network on 2.4GHz
- Flashing firmware is needed
- Higer latency
{% include custom/alerts/Note.html content="Our latency with wireless setups is pretty low, (20-35ms) you will not be able to see a difference in social VR applications. This would only become a noticable change if we ever get DFR working." %}